It took a bit of persistence to really get into this book, but after I worked out Bannister's quirky sense of humour, I started to enjoy his logical discussions.
Bannister sticks the boots into Richard Dawkins and other New Atheists, which I initially thought was a bit unprofessional, but the more I read, the more I realised he wasn't actually judging Dawkins and others, but countering arguments in a way that Dawkins would have trouble taking offence to. In fact, Bannister was quite respectful of Dawkins as a person. I expect they would be able to sit at a dinner table together and have a friendly, robust conversation without too much offence.
In chapter 11, Bannister pays credit to Dawkins:
For all of the fun I poke at Professor Dawkins, I do value him and his fellow New Atheists for forcing me to think. Thus my challenge to my sceptical friends is whether they are similarly willing to critically examine their own assumptions and beliefs. After all, it's only when you're willing to go down to the basement with a flashlight and poke around your foundations that you can really know whether what you're building stands on rock, sand or simply hot air.I especially like Bannister's consideration for Dawkins's daughter:
I have no idea what Dawkins's daughter, Juliet, does or does not believe - but if she is an atheist like her father, I hope she isn't having to fend off argumentative Anglicans dinging her around the head with soundbites like "You are only an atheist because your daddy is". Or maybe Dawkins displayed incredible philosophical consistency and raised her as a Mennonite, just so he couldn't be accused of foisting his beliefs on his child.Bannister sets out his objective of the book at the end of Chapter 1:
... my hope is that it will encourage you not to be afraid of some of the atheist sound bites that are frequently hurled like brickbats from various directions in our culture.Each of Bannister's chapters start with a nonsensical story, like The Aardvark in the Artichokes, and The Lunatic in the Louvre. This, too, was disconcerting until I followed the logical progression of each chapter to where the nonsense was used by Bannister to demonstrate the equally ridiculous arguments of the New Atheists. As I progressed through the book, the logic grew stronger and the nonsense more relevant.
In the chapter Humpty Dumpty and the Vegan, Bannister quotes Humpty Dumpty (ie. Lewis Carroll) from Through the Looking Glass,
When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean.This forms the basis for a discussion about who gets to define "good" and "evil", as these definitions for fundamentals and moral absolutes for atheistic arguments. (Humpty Dumpty's dilemma!)
Bannister often turns atheistic arguments on themselves throughout the book. For example, in chapter 2 he quotes Christopher Hitchins (an Atheistic writer),
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.Hitchins's most quoted statement has been turned around to argue against his very own case.
Whilst the book certainly tips the scales well onto the positive side for me, I see one glaring omission from Bannister's very logical approach: there's plenty of discussion about "proof" but I'm yet to find deep discussion about faith in the sense that God's Word is self sufficient and self proving. He missed the most important logical point.
As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it. (Isa 55:10-11 NIV)
For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Nothing in all creation is hidden from God's sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account. (Heb 4:12-13 NIV)This is a good book to challenge you to think, affirm your foundations, and add to your toolkit.
Bannister, A., 2015, The Atheist Who Didn't Exist Or: The Dreadful Consequences of Bad Arguments, Monarch Books, Oxford. (I reviewed the Kindle version which I purchased from Amazon.)